🔗 Share this article

When Vladimir Putin visited India four years ago, the international order was markedly different. The brief visit, limited by the pandemic, centered around discussions on strategic and defense cooperation between the two leaders.

Not long after, the full-scale invasion of Ukraine would turn the Russian leader into a figure of international condemnation, significantly restricting his diplomatic travel.

Furthermore, that period preceded a major change in US-India relations, marked by contentious statements and the introduction of substantial import duties.

"In this context, the significance of this diplomatic mission to meet Modi is profound, serving as a signal of enduring ties and a defiance of external pressure," experts emphasize.

A Critical Juncture for Both Nations

The summit takes place at a crucial time. President Putin arrives after rejecting recent diplomatic initiatives for Ukraine, confident due to reported advances by Russian forces.

"From Moscow's perspective, the key significance of this visit is its very occurrence," commented a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It indicates a movement toward something resembling routine global diplomacy."

From Delhi's standpoint, the risks are even higher. The country faces a challenging geopolitical climate, characterized by a less engaged United States, a diminished Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

The tightrope walk was underscored just before the visit, when European ambassadors published a public commentary questioning Russia's peace efforts. This elicited a sharp rebuke from Indian officials, who labeled it an unacceptable interference.

The Enduring Challenge from the North

The India-Russia bond originates from the Cold War era and remains deeply entrenched, with Moscow historically being Delhi's primary arms provider. This alliance was generally accepted by the West before a recent shift.

Over time, Western nations ignored India's substantial purchases of cheap energy from Russia. However, recently failed peace efforts, pressure increased, leading to punitive tariffs and a major chill in US-India ties.

"In response, India has reverted to its default strategy of 'hedging'," explained a foreign policy expert. "This demonstrates to the US that it has alternatives and is observing how the global dynamics settle."

Beyond international politics, India's fundamental concern with Russia is geography. "China continues to be the greatest threat to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a counterweight against China," the analyst added.

The deepening partnership between Russia and China has raised alarms in Delhi, leading to efforts to avoid an excessively close bond between its northern neighbor and its longtime partner.

This concern has also accelerated India's drive to reduce its defense procurement, shrinking its reliance on Russian equipment from about 70% to under 40% in recent years.

"India will attempt to strike a balance: buy sufficient Russian arms to maintain the alliance, but avoid so dependent that a supply disruption would leave it vulnerable," the analyst concluded.

Energy and Economic Ties

Increased economic cooperation is likely to be a key agenda item. President Putin has publicly emphasized plans to take cooperation with India to a "higher plane", in spite of Western sanctions.

The matter of crude oil purchases remains central. While the Indian government has stated to keep buying Russian oil, recent restrictions have dampened activity from the commercial buyers. At the same time, India has moved to increase imports of US energy.

A Russian official admitted "obstacles" in economic cooperation but said it would continue without major disruption. The official downplayed the impact of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "insignificant" and "temporary" drops and that Russia possesses the "means" to bypass such measures.

Diplomatic Constraints

As talks proceed, the issue of Ukraine is likely to be mentioned primarily through India's standard call for dialogue and peace.

"While the Indian leader can speak to all parties, India does not possess the necessary leverage to significantly influence the war," the analyst noted. "Beyond urging negotiations, its capacity to effect change is limited."

In the end, despite the public displays of camaraderie between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pragmatic strategic interest," driven by national interest in a rapidly changing world.