🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include decreasing the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Recently, global health authorities issued a warning that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of corporate influence worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be decreased to less than half “according to global guideline limits”, deferred for no less than one year after the bill passes.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for various offences “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the company executive of the Zambian branch claims the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We live in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative stated: “The corporation runs its operations according with applicable local laws. Moreover, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which enable interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The company was “not against rules”, they said, mentioning that young individuals should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, noting that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which involves increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was contacted for response.