Skip to content
Swift Synergy

The Venezuelan Crisis May Now Define Trump's Legacy - and the United States' Position in the Global Order

Following launching a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be entering the state-building arena.

In a striking media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the president announced that US forces had effectively apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a delegation comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be assuming control of the embattled nation.

"We are going to manage the country until such time as we can do a secure, orderly and careful transition," he said.

What exactly "governing the state" involves is unclear, but the pledge represents an sudden change of course for the president, full of contradictions and daunting challenges.

A leader who campaigned against "endless conflicts", who sharply criticised past US efforts at regime change and who vowed to implement an "America First" foreign policy is now betting his presidency on successfully revitalizing a South American nation whose economy is in shambles and whose political stability has been eroded by decades of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was persistently optimistic.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no exception. He pledged to recruit American oil firms to rebuild Venezuela's deteriorating industrial infrastructure, supplying funds for the American rebuilding project and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of sending American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you break it, you own it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has altered Venezuela's prospects – for better or worse.

Trump came to power nearly a year ago promising to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has proven that he is more than willing to use military force worldwide.

In the past week, he authorized air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck nuclear facilities in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike past actions, which have mostly involved missiles and warplanes that reduce the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are markedly different.

His aim, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Domestic and International Reaction

That twist on Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra may be tough for some of Trump's backers to swallow.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who broke with the president after accusing him of abandoning his political base, was quick to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's perpetual use of force and support of overseas conflicts is understandable because we are forced to pay for it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another prominent Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on arms and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to retake seized US oil and halt fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the armed intervention against a "illegitimate government" as "firm and legitimate".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his appearance, the president argued the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" priorities because it ensured US regional security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American foreign policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will not be challenged again."

The purpose of the new US security policy, he said, was to "safeguard commerce, land and resources that are central to our security interests." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to capture Maduro will provoke larger concerns in international relations, however, and impact American relations with the world's other significant global powers.

The Chinese government issued a statement voicing surprise and condemning what it said was a reckless attack on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered comparable condemnations of Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has frequently appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed concern about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My primary concern is now Russia will use this to justify their illegal and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an invasion of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic opponents were more direct.

"The United States should not be running other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in endless wars and overthrow attempts that carry devastating results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a lawbreaker and a autocrat with a record of human rights abuses. But he censured Trump's decision not to consult with congressional leaders before initiating the attack.

"Donald Trump has the legal duty to abide by the law and uphold institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, said that he chose not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "disclose" details of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a success – with zero American casualties and minimal damage to US equipment. Trump, with his typical bravado, portrayed the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most astonishing, effective and impressive displays of American military might and proficiency in US history."

Now he is betting his presidency on that victory continuing, as the US claims it will take over running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that truly entails is unknown. He and his administration must fortify a nation that has been in turmoil for years while calming a hemisphere that is sure to be apprehensive of what Trump's foreign policy has in store for them.

About the author

Virginia Hughes

A wellness coach and writer passionate about holistic health and empowering others through mindful living.

Swift Synergy

Type to search articles.