🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate atomic talks with the United States provided that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations produced results, and disclosed new appeals had come from go-betweens to resume negotiations with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult path since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the US president asserting the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries exercised their authority to restore international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Representatives claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Status

Tehran representatives stated the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the offer could be reintroduced in various formats if talks reopen.

Trump recently said he had been getting signals that Iran desired to resume discussions, but confidentially Iranian officials claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the idea of global regulations, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by combat operations. He asserted the assaults commenced with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were carried out with complete American awareness and coordination, making confidence challenging to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to impose their desires during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and stays the ultimate solution to resolve conflicts, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will get a answer in the identical approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the struggle of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but were unable to destroy. The Iranian people have developed more powerful, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the face of this attack."