🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. The movie, though, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized version circulated by Russian state media that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to forge a tailor-made version of Putin. This figure is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a Russian James Bond who always knows beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a television show released last October, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a invented security officer selected by fate to “save” Russia from disorder. Although he is called a different name, the message is clear: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this same narrative instead of debunking it. A new film inspired by a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, the president is presented as having been picked by influential figures to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to take the top job. He replies is that he would rather govern from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. In reality, these events took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one actually pleaded with him to take the job. The position was effectively a casting call with no shortage of contenders. Central to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the state in practice.

• The shortlist included various figures, among them a reformer subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• According to an expert who studied his rise, the chosen candidate simply fitted the required parameters: loyal, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A property developer close to the process said the key criterion was controllability and loyalty, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not engaged in actual agent work.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. The grittier version led local outlets and online audiences to draw visual parallels with Putin. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a small victory. Its exclusion of public dissent, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is frequently an omnipotent figure who remains unseen on screen. His influence is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently validate the very myths it perhaps aims to question.